Player pop50 posted a message on 06/01 03:04 on the Wonderz Forum: Cost of click to batch cache. Answer him on Wonderz and exchange with other players

Yes... And I also confirm that the workforce will be the same if we win a Rolex! I assure you, though, that saving a Rolex on a Cache A Lot 6 credits puts us out of business in a few hours! It is the same principle between a blu Ray and a Centrifuge, with a lower price difference obviously but the reasoning is nevertheless the same.

I confess that I am a little perplexed by your reasoning, once again the idea of varying the cost of the Cache A Lot makes it possible to be transparent by proposing the most "fair cost" compared to the price of the Loot. I will not go any further in the economic explanation but I assure you that we do not make more "margin" on a 11-credit batch cache. I can only repeat, by giving you my word on this, that it is precisely because we did not want to make you "overpay" for the gifts that we have set up this system, there is no trick and even less the possibility of increasing everything to 6 credits, it would be economically untenable, really!

Sorry if I can't convince you anyway!

Have a good weekend and enjoy the games!
The web'.

Hello 🙋

I understand the essence of the thought but I nevertheless specify that the reasoning is not exact. You have to understand what you mean by beneficiary... I'm not going to go into the economic details, but the fact of only counting the cost of the lot does not mean that you are a "beneficiary". To be a beneficiary you have to be able to offer you the gift you win but also all that that implies: there are 15 of us working to provide you with quality games and service, all of this is not free...

I assure you that if all the Cache-A-Lots were to increase to 6 credits , you would obviously be delighted 😂, but the beautiful story of MadWin and DreamCentury would end in a few weeks, as dozens of sites have done. games since we exist!

In short, all our games are calculated at the fairest "cost" and the fact of varying the prices of Cache a Lots allows us precisely not to make you pay too much for "smaller" gifts . Conversely, Cache-A-Lots at 11 credits are justified by the higher value of the first prize!

Good games!
The Web'

I don't understand... If the Madwin order manager orders a Blu-ray or a centrifuge, with a cost per click of 6 credits , the labor costs the same

---

🙋 web I'm

going to end up crying about you at mad after you say 🤕 With the

new version of KING, you get a lot of money even if the click only costs three credits!

Frankly the gains you propose are largely overpaid 😎 To ban

this new version 😈 Good

weekend anyway and 🍸

---

I like this game:=)
but I find that there are missing loot games with bigger gifts!
it would be nice to diversify more... 😗

Hello 🙋

I understand the essence of the thought but I nevertheless specify that the reasoning is not exact. You have to understand what you mean by beneficiary... I'm not going to go into the economic details, but the fact of only counting the cost of the lot does not mean that you are a "beneficiary". To be a beneficiary you have to be able to offer you the gift you win but also all that that implies: there are 15 of us working to provide you with quality games and service, all of this is not free...

I assure you that if all the Cache-A-Lots were to increase to 6 credits , you would obviously be delighted 😂, but the beautiful story of MadWin and DreamCentury would end in a few weeks, as dozens of sites have done. games since we exist!

In short, all our games are calculated at the fairest "cost" and the fact of varying the prices of Cache a Lots allows us precisely not to make you pay too much for "smaller" gifts . Conversely, Cache-A-Lots at 11 credits are justified by the higher value of the first prize!

Good games!
The Web'

Date of message edition 06/01/2011 11:42:12